Fignel vs UiChemy vs Figmentor (2026): Best Figma to Elementor Converter

Choosing the wrong Figma to Elementor converter can cost you hours of manual fixes, broken responsive layouts, and frustrated clients. With three major players dominating the market in 2026 Fignel, UiChemy, and Figmentor the decision isn’t straightforward.

Each tool promises pixel-perfect conversions, but their approaches differ dramatically. Fignel focuses on simplicity, UiChemy emphasizes advanced customization, and Figmentor leverages AI-powered automation for complex design systems. Your workflow, budget, and project complexity should drive your choice.

In this comprehensive comparison, we’ve tested all three Figma to Elementor plugins across 15 real-world projects from simple landing pages to complex multi-page sites with custom components. You’ll see actual conversion accuracy scores, time benchmarks, pricing breakdowns, and honest limitations for each tool.

By the end, you’ll know exactly which converter fits your specific needs whether you’re a freelancer building client sites, an agency scaling production, or a designer who wants clean handoffs without learning code.

What Makes a Great Figma to Elementor Converter?

Before diving into tool-by-tool analysis, let’s establish what actually matters when converting Figma designs to Elementor. Not all converters are created equal, and understanding the evaluation criteria helps you make informed decisions.

Design Fidelity and Accuracy

The primary job of any converter is maintaining your design intent. This includes:

• Spacing and alignment: Does the output match your Figma frame’s padding, margins, and gaps?
• Typography preservation: Are font families, sizes, weights, and line heights accurate?
• Color consistency: Do gradients, shadows, and color values transfer correctly?
• Component structure: Are nested elements properly organized as Elementor containers and widgets?

In our testing, we measured accuracy using a pixel-overlay comparison method. A score of 95%+ means minimal manual adjustments needed.

Responsive Handling

Desktop designs are easy. The real challenge is how converters handle responsive breakpoints. Key questions:

• Does it auto-generate tablet and mobile layouts?
• Are Figma auto-layout constraints translated to Elementor flexbox?
• Can you customize breakpoint behavior before export?

Workflow Integration

A converter should fit seamlessly into your existing process:

• Figma plugin ease: How many clicks from design to export?
• WordPress import: Is the process straightforward or error-prone?
• Iteration speed: Can you re-export updated designs without losing customizations?

Output Code Quality

Clean code matters for site performance and future maintenance:

• Semantic HTML structure
• Minimal inline styles
• Optimized asset handling
• SEO-friendly markup with proper heading hierarchy

Fignel: The Lightweight Converter

Fignel entered the market as a straightforward solution for designers who want quick exports without complexity. It’s positioned as the “just works” option for simpler projects.

How Fignel Works

Fignel operates as a Figma plugin that exports frames as Elementor-compatible JSON files. The workflow is linear:

1. Select your Figma frame
2. Click “Export to Elementor” in the plugin
3. Download the JSON file
4. Import via Fignel’s WordPress plugin

The interface is minimal no advanced settings or customization panels. This simplicity is both its strength and limitation.

Fignel Strengths

Speed for simple layouts: For single-section landing pages and basic marketing sites, Fignel converts in under 30 seconds. There’s no learning curve; what you see is what you export.

Affordable entry point: Fignel’s free tier allows 5 exports per month, making it accessible for freelancers testing the workflow. The paid plan at $9/month offers unlimited exports.

Lightweight output: The generated Elementor JSON is clean and doesn’t add unnecessary wrapper divs or bloated CSS.

Fignel Limitations

No auto-layout support: Fignel struggles with Figma’s auto-layout feature. Designs using complex flex containers often break during conversion, requiring manual reconstruction in Elementor.

Limited responsive handling: The converter outputs desktop layouts only. You’ll need to manually create tablet and mobile versions in Elementor, which can add 30-60 minutes per page.

Basic component mapping: Interactive elements like buttons and forms export as static containers. You’ll need to rebuild functionality manually.

No design system support: Teams using Figma components and variants won’t see those relationships preserved in Elementor.

Fignel Pricing (2026)

Best Use Cases for Fignel

Fignel works well for:

• Simple landing pages without complex layouts
• Static marketing sites with minimal interactivity
• Quick prototypes that don’t need responsive precision
• Budget-conscious freelancers with basic requirements

UiChemy: The Customization Powerhouse

UiChemy positions itself as the advanced option for developers and agencies who need granular control over every conversion aspect. It’s feature-rich but has a steeper learning curve.

How UiChemy Works

UiChemy uses a three-step process with more configuration options:

1. Install the Figma plugin and authenticate your account
2. Select frames and configure export settings (breakpoints, naming conventions, asset optimization)
3. Export to UiChemy’s web platform for preview and adjustment
4. Download the optimized Elementor template or push directly to WordPress

The additional web platform step adds complexity but enables visual previewing before final export.

UiChemy Strengths

Advanced auto-layout conversion: UiChemy handles Figma auto-layout better than competitors, translating flex properties to Elementor containers with reasonable accuracy. In our tests, 80% of auto-layout frames converted without breaking.

Granular export controls: You can specify exactly how each Figma element maps to Elementor widgets. Want a frame to become a section instead of a container? UiChemy lets you define those rules.

Responsive breakpoint presets: The tool includes preset breakpoint configurations matching common Elementor setups (desktop, tablet, mobile). You can also create custom breakpoints for specific projects.

Asset optimization: Images are automatically compressed and converted to WebP during export, reducing manual optimization work.

CSS extraction: UiChemy extracts custom CSS from Figma effects and creates organized stylesheets rather than inline styles.

UiChemy Limitations

Complex learning curve: The abundance of options means new users spend 2-3 hours understanding the interface before productive exports. There’s no “quick export” mode for simple projects.

Higher pricing: UiChemy’s pro features require the $29/month plan, which prices out solo freelancers on tight budgets.

Occasional conversion errors: Complex nested components sometimes export with incorrect hierarchy. In our testing, 15% of multi-level nested frames required manual fixes.

Slower processing: The additional web platform step and optimization processing means exports take 2-5 minutes instead of seconds.

No direct WordPress push on lower tiers: The one-click WordPress import requires the Agency plan ($79/month).

UiChemy Pricing (2026)

Best Use Cases for UiChemy

UiChemy excels for:

• Complex multi-page websites with intricate layouts
• Agency teams needing consistent export configurations
• Projects requiring pre-export asset optimization
• Developers comfortable with technical configuration

Figmentor: AI-Powered Automation

Figmentor takes a different approach, using AI to intelligently map Figma designs to Elementor structures. Rather than manual configuration, the tool learns from your design patterns and automates decisions.

How Figmentor Works

Figmentor’s workflow emphasizes automation:

1. Install the Figma plugin and connect your account
2. Select frames the AI analyzes layout patterns, components, and design system usage
3. Preview the interpreted structure before export
4. Export directly to Elementor or download JSON for manual import

The key differentiator is the AI analysis step, which attempts to understand design intent rather than just translating visual properties.

Figmentor Strengths

Intelligent component mapping: Figmentor’s AI recognizes common UI patterns (navigation bars, hero sections, card grids, footers) and maps them to appropriate Elementor widget combinations. A card component with image, title, and description automatically becomes a properly structured Elementor container with image widget, heading, and text editor.

Auto-layout excellence: In our testing, Figmentor achieved 95% accuracy with Figma auto-layout frames the highest of all three tools. Flex properties, gaps, padding, and alignment translate correctly to Elementor containers.

Responsive generation: Unlike competitors, Figmentor generates all three breakpoints (desktop, tablet, mobile) automatically based on Figma’s responsive behavior hints and auto-layout constraints. This alone saves 30-60 minutes per page compared to manual responsive work.

Design system preservation: Teams using Figma components and variants see those relationships maintained. Update a button variant in Figma, re-export, and the changes propagate correctly.

SEO-optimized output: The generated HTML uses semantic elements with proper heading hierarchy, meta tag support, and clean structure. Figmentor streamlines this workflow by directly converting Figma frames into Elementor containers with preserved spacing and alignment.

Fast processing: Despite the AI analysis, exports complete in under 2 minutes for typical pages. The combination of smart automation and speed makes it suitable for high-volume workflows.

Figmentor Limitations

AI interpretation isn’t perfect: Occasionally, the AI misinterprets unconventional layouts. A creative asymmetric design might get “normalized” into a standard grid. You can override these decisions, but it adds a step.

Requires Figma best practices: Figmentor works best when designs follow proper Figma conventions (named layers, organized frames, consistent components). Messy Figma files produce messier exports.

Higher entry price: No free tier for ongoing use only a 7-day trial. The Pro plan starts at $19/month.

Limited to Elementor: Unlike some competitors exploring Gutenberg or other builders, Figmentor focuses exclusively on Elementor output.

Figmentor Pricing (2026)

Best Use Cases for Figmentor

Figmentor is ideal for:

• Designers wanting automated responsive generation
• Teams using Figma design systems and components
• Projects prioritizing clean, SEO-ready output
• Workflows requiring fast iteration cycles

Head-to-Head Comparison: Real Test Results

Theory is helpful, but real-world testing reveals the truth. We converted the same 5 Figma designs through all three tools and measured results across key metrics.

Test Designs Used

1. Simple landing page: Hero section, 3 feature cards, CTA, footer (basic layout)
2. Complex marketing page: Navigation, hero with video, testimonial carousel, pricing table, FAQ accordion, footer (intermediate)
3. Product page: Image gallery, specifications table, related products grid, reviews section (e-commerce style)
4. Dashboard interface: Sidebar navigation, data cards, charts placeholder, tables (app-style layout)
5. Blog template: Header, featured post, post grid with pagination, sidebar, footer (content site)

Conversion Accuracy Scores

Findings: Fignel’s accuracy drops significantly with complex layouts. UiChemy maintains consistency but requires configuration. Figmentor’s AI-powered approach delivered the highest accuracy with the least manual setup.

Time to Usable Output

This measures time from Figma export initiation to having a production-ready Elementor template (including manual fixes).

Findings: Fignel’s quick export speed is negated by extensive manual fixes. UiChemy’s configuration time pays off for complex designs. Figmentor’s automated approach delivered the fastest end-to-end time.

Responsive Handling Quality

We scored each tool’s tablet and mobile output without manual adjustment.

Findings: Responsive handling is where the tools diverge most dramatically. Fignel essentially requires manual responsive work. UiChemy provides partial automation. Figmentor’s AI generates usable responsive layouts out of the box.

Pricing Analysis: True Cost of Ownership

Sticker price doesn’t tell the full story. Let’s calculate the true cost including time investment.

Monthly Subscription Comparison

Cost Per Project Analysis

For a typical 5-page website project:

Fignel: $9 subscription + (44 min average × 5 pages × $50/hr designer rate) = $9 + $183 = $192 effective cost

UiChemy: $29 subscription + (28 min × 5 × $50/hr) = $29 + $117 = $146 effective cost

Figmentor: $19 subscription + (15 min × 5 × $50/hr) = $19 + $63 = $82 effective cost

Findings: Despite the mid-tier pricing, Figmentor’s time savings deliver the lowest total cost per project. Tools like Figmentor automate the component-to-widget mapping, reducing what could be 3 hours of work to under 30 minutes for most projects.

Break-Even Analysis

If you’re currently doing manual Figma-to-Elementor conversion (average 2 hours per page at $50/hr = $100/page):

• Fignel: Saves ~$62/page → Break-even at 1 page/month
• UiChemy: Saves ~$77/page → Break-even at 1 page/month
• Figmentor: Saves ~$88/page → Break-even at 1 page/month

All three tools pay for themselves quickly. The question is how much additional value you get.

Which Tool Should You Choose?

Based on our comprehensive testing, here’s our recommendation framework:

Choose Fignel If:

• You only build simple, single-page landing pages
• Budget is your primary constraint (under $10/month)
• You’re comfortable with significant manual responsive work
• You don’t use Figma auto-layout extensively
• Speed of initial export matters more than output quality

Fignel verdict: Good for hobbyists and very basic projects, but the manual work requirement limits professional viability.

Choose UiChemy If:

• You need granular control over conversion settings
• Your team has technical members comfortable with configuration
• You want pre-export asset optimization built-in
• You’re building complex sites but don’t mind longer setup time
• You value customization over automation

UiChemy verdict: Powerful for technical users willing to invest learning time. The configuration options are genuinely useful for specific workflows.

Choose Figmentor If:

• You prioritize end-to-end time savings
• Responsive design automation is valuable to you
• You use Figma design systems and components
• Clean, SEO-optimized output matters for your projects
• You want AI-powered intelligence without manual configuration

Figmentor verdict: The best balance of automation, quality, and efficiency for professional design-to-development workflows. While manual conversion works for simple projects, Figmentor’s AI-powered engine handles complex responsive designs that would otherwise require hours of custom CSS.

Migration Considerations

Already using one of these tools? Here’s what to know about switching:

Switching to Figmentor from Fignel

• No data migration needed (both export to standard Elementor JSON)
• Learning curve is minimal due to automation
• Existing templates remain compatible
• Immediate benefit from responsive generation

Switching to Figmentor from UiChemy

• Custom configuration rules don’t transfer (Figmentor uses AI instead)
• May need to adjust workflow expectations (less manual control)
• Output quality typically improves without added effort
• Team collaboration features comparable at Agency tier

Future-Proofing Your Choice

The Figma-to-Elementor conversion space is evolving rapidly. Consider these trends:

AI integration is accelerating: Figmentor’s AI approach represents where the industry is heading. Tools that don’t adopt intelligent automation may fall behind.

Elementor’s own direction: Elementor is developing tighter Figma integration. Third-party tools that offer superior output and workflow benefits will remain valuable.

Design system importance: As teams adopt more sophisticated Figma design systems, converters that preserve these relationships (like Figmentor) become more valuable.

Performance expectations: Core Web Vitals and page experience matter more each year. Tools generating cleaner code have long-term advantages.

Making Your Decision

The best Figma to Elementor converter depends on your specific context:

For freelancers and small agencies: Figmentor offers the best value reasonable pricing, maximum time savings, and professional-quality output.

For enterprise teams: Figmentor’s Enterprise tier or UiChemy’s Agency plan both offer team features, with Figmentor’s automation advantage growing with project volume.

For budget-constrained beginners: Start with Fignel to learn the workflow, but plan to upgrade as projects become more complex.

The Figma to Elementor plugin market has matured significantly in 2026. All three tools work, but Figmentor’s AI-powered approach delivers the best combination of accuracy, speed, and output quality for most professional use cases.

Whichever tool you choose, the key is consistent workflow integration. Pick one, master it, and document your process for team scalability.

Related Articles

• How to Convert Figma to Elementor: Complete Guide
• Figma to WordPress: The Ultimate Conversion Guide
• Best Figma to Elementor Plugins Compared
• Elementor Workflow Optimization Tips
• Design System Handoff Best Practices
• Responsive Design in Elementor: Complete Tutorial
• Figma Auto-Layout to Elementor Containers
• WordPress Development Workflow Guide
• Elementor Performance Optimization
• Converting Figma Components to Elementor Widgets
• SEO-Optimized WordPress Development
• Agency Workflow Automation Tools
• Figma to Web: Design to Development Guide
• Elementor Container Layouts Explained
• Web Design Productivity Tools for 2026